Fidelity

Design against build.

Design from Figma or an image, build from a screenshot or a URL. Scored per category, every comparison kept.

Design against build
Put the Figma frame and the built screen side by side. Every value that drifted is named.
Figma in, screenshot or URL in
Nothing to install and no plugin to keep up to date.
Scored per category
Text, colour, spacing, radius and layout each get their own number rather than one overall verdict.
Kept, not thrown away
Every comparison is saved and filterable, so the screen that slid between two releases is easy to find.
Core capabilities

What a comparison gives back

Pick a capability to see it drawn from a sample audit.

  1. Text and typography, colour, spacing and gaps, radius and borders, layout and sizing — each scored on its own, so a wrong colour cannot hide inside a good layout.

Common use cases

Where the build drifts

Usually quietly, and usually in spacing.

a fidelity comparison · sample audit
At review

Check the build against the file before anyone argues about it

Side by side, overlay, or design and build alone. The disagreement becomes a list of named tokens.

fidelity history · sample workspace
Across a release

Watch a screen go from 72 to 96

Run it again after the fixes. The history keeps both, so the improvement is a line rather than a claim.

handing it over
Handing work over

Give an agent something mechanical to do

A radius that should be 12 and renders 8 needs no discussion. Export the work order and let the agent close them.

Benefits

The least arguable findings in the product

  • /100overall, plus five category scores

    Scored where it drifted

    One score to notice that something drifted, and five category scores that say where.

  • radius: 12 found 8

    Named, not described

    Expected, found, and the token to change — no screenshots to squint at.

  • 7296

    A trend, not a verdict

    Every comparison is kept, so the screen that slid is the one you open.

Works with what you have

Two sides, four inputs

Whatever the design lives in, and whatever the build is reachable as.

A Figma screen

A link to the frame, or the Figma file itself.

An image

An image, for when the design only exists as an export.

A live URL

A live URL, rendered at mobile, tablet or desktop width so you compare like with like.

A screenshot

A screenshot of the build exactly as it rendered for you.

FAQ

What a front-end lead asks first

What goes on each side?

Design: a Figma screen, frame link or image. Build: a screenshot or a live URL, at mobile, tablet or desktop.

How is the score made?

Issues carry a category and a severity. Overall fidelity is out of 100, with a per-category score beside it.

Why keep the history?

Fidelity is a trend. The screen that slid is the one worth opening.

Can I hand the issues to whoever fixes them?

Yes — a Markdown work order for a coding agent, or CSV for a backlog.

The tester app

Test from your pocket

The uTestMe tester app runs a study on a phone. Taps and screens recorded, consent first, results in the same view.

Coming soon onApp StoreGet it onGoogle Play
Scan to install
  • Tap tracking
  • Screen recording
  • Consent first
Test code · K7F2-9QA