The slow part was never the testing.
It was the queue in front of it. AI testers go ahead of that queue, so the first answer takes minutes.
One morning, start to finish
The sample study every workspace starts with, on a clock.
09:14Monday
You paste a prototype link and a goal
One sentence: “reach checkout”. AI testers start before the kettle boils.
09:31Monday
The AI testers finish, and the spread is visible
A cautious newcomer needs twenty steps where a power user needs thirteen.
10:05Monday
The finding goes to whoever owns the screen
Ranked critical, with the field, the attempt and the tester’s words attached.
11:40Monday
The fix ships, and the same study confirms it
Re-run the AI testers, or hand the link to a real person. Same tasks, same scoring.
What is in the product today
Nothing here is a roadmap item.
- 0
- Capabilities
- 0
- Question-block types
- 0
- Ready-made study templates
- 0
- Free credits a month
Usability, design and performance in one workspace.
From five-second tests to card sorts.
Real studies, with the tasks and questions written.
25 simulated AI testers, or a study end to end.
Against the way testing is usually done
A practice, not a product — and the right-hand column wins a row.
| uTestMe | Recruited moderated testing | |
|---|---|---|
| First answer | Minutes — the AI testers run the moment the study exists. | A recruiting cycle: find people, schedule them, run the sessions, write it up. |
| Cost per iteration | Some compute. Testing the same flow five times in a week is normal here. | Each round pays for recruiting and moderation again, so most flows get one round. |
| Who runs it | The designer or PM who owns the flow, same day, no research request. | Someone trained to moderate — which is a real skill, not a formality. |
| Evidence trail | Every claim tied to the beat it happened on, scored identically for AI and human sessions. | As good as the note-taking on the day, and usually a recording somebody has to re-watch. |
| Depth per session | Structured think-aloud — broad, fast, and honest about being simulated. A recorded live call when a thread needs following. | A skilled moderator following a thread no script anticipated. This column wins this row. |
A trained moderator with two weeks surfaces things no simulation will — which is why uTestMe runs moderated calls too. What it removes is the queue, not the person.
Where it fits
Between drawing it and building it — and then again after
The cheapest moment to find a problem is before anyone builds it. The next is before it reaches everyone. uTestMe is built for both.
- In the design reviewAudit the screen against one goal and bring ranked findings instead of a preference.
- Before the buildRun AI testers on the prototype and fix what stops people while it is still a file.
- Before the rolloutShare the same study with real users and confirm the finding held once it was real.
- After it shipsWatch the paths real visitors take and the speed they get, and see which deploy changed it.
Six jobs, one workspace
Product designers
Test a flow the same week you draw it, while changing it is still cheap.
Product managers
Walk into the review with the problems in order and the session that produced each one beside it.
Researchers
Save the sessions with real people for the questions only a person can settle.
Agencies
A workspace per client, and a report you can put your name on.
Content designers
Read the copy against the job it does, and get rewrites in the house voice you saved.
Engineers
Load-test the API before launch, watch the Web Vitals real visitors get, and hear about it in Slack when a deploy makes it worse.
Sell you a confident number we cannot stand behind
Simulated says simulated, an estimate says estimate, and a metric nothing measured reads “not measured” — never zero. It is enforced in the product, which is why its numbers are worth quoting.
What a stakeholder asks
The four that decide whether this becomes a tool or a tab.
Does this replace research?
No. It replaces the waiting. Human sessions still decide.
What do we have to change to adopt it?
Nothing, to test a prototype. A live site takes one script tag, so testers’ clicks and screens are recorded.
How do we know the AI results are any good?
Run the same study with real testers. The report keeps both columns apart.
What is the risk if it does not work out?
A signup. Nothing installed, nothing to unwind.
Ask for a walkthrough
Tell us what you want to test and we will show it working on your own flow. About twenty minutes.
Test from your pocket
The uTestMe tester app runs a study on a phone. Taps and screens recorded, consent first, results in the same view.
- Tap tracking
- Screen recording
- Consent first